Independent research site. Not affiliated with any Privileged Access Management vendor. No sponsored content, no email capture, no demo upsell.
PAMCost.com
Pricing-model deep dive · verified June 2026

How Vendors Price Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Five pricing models dominate the PAM market in 2026. Knowing which model applies to your shortlisted vendors is the difference between a fair side-by-side comparison and a $200K mistake.

Direct Answer
What are the PAM pricing models in 2026?
Per-user-per-month (Keeper, JumpCloud, Okta). Per-administrator-per-year (ManageEngine PAM360). Open-source free (Teleport Community, HashiCorp Boundary Community). Per-resource (Teleport Enterprise). Bundle-quote (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Delinea, One Identity, Wallix, Saviynt, StrongDM, KeeperPAM, Segura).

1. Per-user-per-month (SaaS)

The model most procurement teams are used to from SaaS in general. Vendor publishes a per-user-per-month rate, with annual billing typically discounted vs monthly. Most vendors in this category have a free tier or time-limited trial.

Vendors

Best for

SMB and mid-market buyers wanting predictable per-seat cost and SaaS deployment. Annual billing the norm; switching cost is configuration time, not licence sunk cost.

2. Per-administrator-per-year (self-hosted list)

Published per-admin annual rate, typically with a key or resource cap. The buyer pays for additional admin packs and key packs separately.

Vendors

Best for

Mid-market and enterprise buyers wanting on-premise deployment with a public anchor. Procurement-team-friendly because the headline number is real.

3. Open-source free

Community Edition is free under an OSI-approved licence. Commercial path is quote-only.

Vendors

Best for

Engineering-led teams that want the control plane in-house and have the operational capacity to run HA, upgrades, audit log retention and IdP integration. Crossing the eligibility cap triggers commercial conversion.

4. Per-resource (quote)

The vendor charges per resource (server, database, Kubernetes cluster, app) rather than per admin. Quote-only; useful when you have many admins but few resources, or few admins but many resources.

Vendors

Best for

Cloud-native organisations with disproportionate resource counts (microservice architectures with thousands of Kubernetes pods accessed by a small SRE team).

5. Bundle-quote (enterprise)

Sales-led pricing with multi-year commit, multi-module bundle, and implementation services scoped separately. The headline figure is rarely the per-admin cost; it is a platform contract.

Vendors

Best for

Regulated enterprises that need full-suite PAM with mainframe / legacy / cloud coverage and have the procurement runway for a 3-6 month evaluation.

How to normalise across models

The fair side-by-side comparison normalises to per-admin-per-year USD. For per-user-per-month SaaS vendors multiply by 12. For per-admin-per-year vendors divide the published bundle by the admin count it covers. For open-source vendors, the comparison is zero at qualifying scale and quote-only above. For per-resource and bundle-quote, you cannot normalise without a quote. See methodology for the full calculator model.

See also

Last verified June 2026 · Next refresh September 2026